Cellulosic ethanol – The basics: Conversion pathway - Thermochemical


Series: Cellulosic ethanol
- The basics: Conversion pathway – Thermochemical

1. Introduction

Currently, the thermochemical conversion pathway for converting biomass resources into ethanol occupies a subsidiary position. This approach has received modest levels of support in the past. Nevertheless, it is worthwhile reviewing the concept in the framework of this series about cellulosic ethanol.
The pathway involves two major steps:
(1) Gasification of the lignocellulosic biomass to generate syngas.
(2) Transformation of the syngas in ethanol. This second step can be carried out by chemical catalysts or fermentation (hybrid route). In contrast to chemical catalytic conversion, fermentation conversion can produce pure ethanol as opposed to a mixture of alcohols.
 Advantages
- All of the organic matter within the feedstock is broken down, which results in the release of a higher proportion of carbon for ethanol production.
- Gasification is suitable for all biomass sources, thermochemical conversion can use a wider range of feedstocks than biochemical conversion. It is not adversely affected by lignin in the biomass. In fact, it is mostly appropriate for forest feedstocks and wastes rich in lignin.
- It requires fewer processing chemicals.
Disadvantages
- There is little scope for valorization of co-products since all of the biomass is converted.
- Biomass feedstock moisture content heavily influences alcohol yields and emissions.
- The process is complex and temperatures during gasification are relatively high.
- Raw syngas contains catalyst and fermentation contaminants that must be removed before alcohol production.
The general process areas include: feedstock preparation, gasification, gas cleaning and conditioning, ethanol production and purification. Many possible configurations exist for each conversion approach: there are several gasification technologies as well as ethanol synthesis options.

2. Feedstock preparation

The size in which the feedstocks have been harvested needs to be reduced to the level where it is easy to handle and the process becomes more efficient. For instance, agricultural wastes need to be grinded and forest wastes have to be taken through a chipping process in order to reach a uniform size. Also, the biomass is dried from the as-received moisture to that required for proper feeding into the gasifier.

3. Gasification

Gasification is the exothermic partial oxidation of biomass with process conditions optimized for high yields of gaseous products (synthesis gas, syngas or producer gas). It involves the devolatilization and conversion of biomass in an atmosphere of steam and/or oxygen. The crude synthesis gas is primarily composed of CO, H2, CO2, CH4, tars and water.
There are two general classes of gasifiers:
(1) Partial oxidation (POX) gasifiers (directly-heated gasifiers). They use the exothermic reaction between oxygen and organics to provide the heat necessary to devolatilize biomass and to convert residual carbon-rich chars. In POX gasifiers, the heat to drive the process is generated internally within the gasifier. A disadvantage of this kind of gasifiers is that oxygen production is expensive and typically requires large plant sizes to improve economics.
(2) Steam gasifiers (indirectly-heated gasifiers). They accomplish biomass heating and gasification through heat transfer from a hot solid or through a heat transfer surface. Either byproduct char and/or a portion of the product gas can be combusted with air (external to the gasifier itself) to provide the energy required for gasification. Steam gasifiers have the advantage of not requiring oxygen; but since most operate at low pressure, they require product gas compression for downstream purification and synthesis unit operations.

4. Gas cleanup and conditioning

This stage consists of multiple units:
- Reforming of tars and other hydrocarbons to CO and H2.
One of the challenges of gasification is the management of higher molecular weight volatiles that condense into tars, which are both a fouling challenge and a potential source of persistent environmental pollutants such as PAH. They can be reformed into useful syngas using a fluidizable catalyst.
- Syngas quench.
The hot syngas is cooled through heat exchange with the steam cycle and additional cooling via water scrubbing. The scrubber also removes impurities such as particulates and ammonia along with any residual tars.
- Acid gas (CO2 and H2S) removal.
The cooled syngas enters an amine unit to remove the CO2 and H2S. Later, the H2S is reduced to elemental sulphur.

5. Alcohol production and separation

5.1 Chemical catalysis of syngas
The cleaned and conditioned syngas is converted to alcohols in a fixed bed reactor. The syngas is further compressed to the required synthesis pressure and sent through a fixed-bed molybdenum-sulfide-based catalyst to synthesize a variety of mixed alcohols.
After synthesis, the alcohols are cooled and condensed away from the unconverted syngas. The mixture is cooled through heat exchange with the steam cycle and other process streams. The condensed alcohols undergo distillation and purification to recover pure ethanol. The depressurized alcohol stream is dehydrated using vapor-phase molecular sieves. Methanol is recovered and recycled to the synthesis reactor in order to boost ethanol yields.

Figure 1. Thermochemical conversion – Chemical catalysis of syngas (extracted from Reference [3])

5.2 Fermentation of syngas (hybrid route)
The clean and conditioned syngas is fed to fermentation where it is converted to ethanol. The resulting fermentation broth is quite dilute, typically containing 2% or less of ethanol. The ethanol can be recovered from the broth using conventional recovery schemes. A simple gas-sparged tank reactor, operating in batch or continuous mode, can be used for the fermentation.
The micro-organisms used for ethanol production from syngas mixtures are anaerobes that use a heterofermentative version of the acetyl-CoA pathway for acetogenesis. The acetyl-CoA intermediate is then converted into either acetic acid or ethanol as a primary metabolic product. In contrast to many other syngas-based processes, syngas fermentation performance is not tied to a specific ratio of H2 to CO. While the organisms generally prefer CO to H2, both CO and H2/CO2 mixtures can be simultaneously converted.

Figure 2. Thermochemical conversion – Fermentation of syngas (extracted from Reference [6])

6. Cases studies: biorefineries at commercial scale

Case study: Enerkem (gasification + chemical catalysis)
The Enerkem biorefinery in Edmonton is the first commercial-scale plant in the world to produce cellulosic ethanol from non-recyclable, non-compostable mixed municipal solid waste (MSW).
The plant was officially opened in June 2014 and began to produce and sell biomethanol since 2016. A new methanol-to-ethanol conversion unit was installed in 2017 and the production of ethanol started in September of that year.

INEOS New Planet BioEnergy plant was constructed for demonstrating at full commercial scale the economic conversion of a variety of different lignocellulosic waste biomass feedstocks to bioethanol and renewable electricity utilizing the INEOS Bio technology. In addition to having the capacity to produce 8 Mgal (30 Ml) per year of ethanol, the plant also could generate up to 6 MW of electricity.
The construction was completed in June 2012 and the first production of cellulosic ethanol at commercial scale took place one year later. In December 2014, the plant was shut down for the installation of a HCN scrubber. The presence of low levels of hydrogen cyanide, toxic to the organisms involved in the fermentation, was a major problem for the process. In 2016, the NREL reported (2015 Survey of Non-Starch Ethanol and Renewable Hydrocarbon Biofuel Producers) that the plant was idled in 2015 while working on mechanical improvements and was expected to resume operations sometime this year. Finally, in September 2016, Ineos Bio announced its intention to sell its ethanol business, including the New Planet BioEnergy plant.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
References
[1] P.L. Spath, D.C. Dayton: “Preliminary Screening – Technical and Economic Assessment of Synthesis Gas to Fuels and Chemicals with Emphasis on the Potential for Biomass-Derived Syngas”. Technical Report NREL/TP-510-34929, December 2003.
[2] S. Phillips, A. Aden, J. Jechura, D. Dayton: “Thermochemical Ethanol via Indirect Gasification and Mixed Alcohol Synthesis of Lignocellulosic Biomass”. Technical Report
NREL/TP-510-41168, April 2007.
[3] T.D. Foust, A. Aden, A. Dutta, S. Phillips: “An economic and environmental comparison of a biochemical and a thermochemical lignocellulosic ethanol conversion processes”. Cellulose, 16:547–565, June 2009.
[4] A. Dutta et al.: “Process Design and Economics for Conversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol. Thermochemical Pathway by Indirect Gasification and Mixed Alcohol Synthesis”. Technical Report NREL/TP-5100-51400, May 2011.
[5] Daystar et al.:“The NREL Biochemical and Thermochemical Ethanol Conversion Processes: Financial and Environmental Analysis Comparison”. BioResources 10(3), 5096-5116, July 2015
[6] M. Devarapalli, H.K. Atiyeh: “A review of conversion processes for bioethanol production with a focus on syngas fermentation”. Biofuel Research Journal 7 (2015) 268-280.

Popular Posts

Braskem and Sojitz launch Sustainea to produce and market biobased glycols

New HVO plant enters into operation in China

Alcohol-To-Fuel

Biorrefinerías de ácido levulínico

Bio-Polipropileno (Bio-PP)